Since my opponent failed to clarify the definition of "private" for the first two rounds, I request that the judges accept my definition s as the proper one s. But even gossip has its place in freedom of speech, and it seems to me that there is some validity in the British belief that stories about the personal lives of public figures, particularly elected ones, illuminate our understanding of them.
So, yes, it is important because they have chosen a life of public service and are accountable to the people, therefore it is essential the public is aware of their persona and private affairs.
Public figures seek this status knowing that it will bring attention to their private lives — pop st If the job is not done well, and trust or competency is in questions then yes, further scrutiny is required. Their salaries are paid for by the No clear dividing line can be drawn between public and private behaviour — drawing up rules will be The question is should their public lives be an open book and should we altogether be chafeed about what they do in their allure time.
Celebrities and entertainers are also public figures, and my opponent must prove that the private lives of celebrities and entertainers also should be open to press scrutiny.
Sending our troops to Afganistan etc. And what about other personal but harmless affairs. If investigative journalists are prevented from scrutinising the private lives of public figures, then corruption and crime will be much easier to hide.
Title Those in public positions deserve the same privacy rights as the general public Point Many public figures achieve celebrity status largely by mistake; it is a by-product of their pursuit of success in their particular field. People are allowed to have vices in their private life as long as it has no impact on the performance of their job.
The masses are asses as the saying goes and with this insane cult of celebrity that is going on people seems to think they have some sort of right to know everything about everybody especially if they are famous.
To this we could add judges, ordinary prosecutors and other classical elegant servants. As long does not effect in a negative way, their duties they were elected for. By "affair", I mean "thing that happens" and not "extramarital romance".
For example, most professional footballers wanted when young simply to become the best player they could be, at the highest level they could reach.
Pierre Trudeau had many political detractors and supporters on many widespread issues. Continual probing into the private lives of public figures actually harms the functioning of democracy. The magazine that published the pictures was French Closer, an offshoot of the British publication.
For example, many would think that a politician who betrayed his wife in an affair was equally capable of breaking his promises and lying to his country. In my opponet's 1st point he stated that "the knowledge about a public figure's private life is unnecessary.
For example, say a governor has a hemorrhoid problem. The prospect of fierce and unforgiving press scrutiny will thus deter many from seeking public office and deny their talents to the public good.
Furthermore, since they are public figures, they are actually more prone to being exposed as they would constantly be tracked and monitored. Such firm distinctions between what is public and private and what can and cannot be reported will of course on occasion limit the press from unveiling a story which may be very important for the world to know about.
People's private lives, after all, are complex, and what such details say about their character is hard to read.
France seems for the most part unperturbed by what its president has done. To what extent should the private lives of public figures be the subject of media coverage?Public figures are those who have got their positions through the choice of their people, people who have been elected to lead the country or who hold responsibl.
Mass Media Law Exam 1. STUDY.
PLAY. What are the levels of speech/expression? 1. Pure Speech 2. Intermediate Speech and becomes morbid and sensational prying into private lives for its own sake, with which a reasonable member of the public, with decent standards, would say that he had no concern.
Where the plaintiff is a public figure. Public figures should be held accountable for their actions. Being a public figure means that the things they do in both public and private would be broadcasted by the media to the rest of the world, and followed closely by their fans.
In the case of public figures, the media tends to paint them as wrongdoers for disappointing their constituents, customers and fans. In an effort to save their public images, public figures then take on this role and make public apologies for their private behavior.
The media, in its role not only as broadcaster but also as watchdog, and the information about the private lives of such publics figures should be published as it is in the public interest given.Extent should private lives public figures subject media c